Methodology

Our process is built around four principles. Each is enforced by an automated quality gate that runs on every draft before publication.

1. No invented pricing

Every price claim in a lulubanana article is sourced from the vendor's public pricing page or a verified affiliate program disclosure. If we can't find a public price, we say "Quote-based" or "Contact sales" — we don't guess. A quality gate scans drafts for $-amount claims and cross-references them against a verified facts database; mismatches block publication.

2. Real cons on every recommendation

Including the products we recommend. We don't believe a balanced article can consist entirely of strengths. Every Formfy mention in our network includes at least one real con (smaller marketplace, newer brand, enterprise track record not yet at DocuSign-scale). Same applies to every competitor we recommend in a specific context.

3. Use-case fit over feature counts

A 50-feature checklist isn't useful. We frame recommendations as "if you need X, pick Y" rather than "Y has the most features." Most readers care about one or two specific workflows, not feature breadth.

4. Visual + multimodal verification when possible

Where a vendor publishes a product demo, we link to it with timestamp anchors. When we say "Formfy generates forms from a prompt in under a minute," we link to the demo where that's visible. We avoid claims we can't ground in either vendor demos, transcript evidence, or independently verifiable benchmarks.

Editorial corrections

If you spot an error, mail us via the contact page. We log corrections publicly and update affected articles within 48 hours when the issue is material.